neither has a instant way to get a black & white preview of an image. That said, browsing through my collection in DigiKam is usually instantaneous.Ĭ. XnView is much faster initially launching, and sometimes a bit faster browsing.
However, DigiKam does allow keyboard shortcuts to be added to individual tags I will probably start using that.ĭigiKam also has GeoTagging features and a globe/map view with zooming, as well as date-based views and timelines.ī. There is a 'quick access list' which looks like the sets in XnView, but I can't seem to use it while tagging - I'm really not sure what it's for (maybe it's a work in progress?). tagging is easier in XnView you can create tag sets/collections and easily see them in a small area of the screen.ĭigiKam only seems to be able to show the tag tree during tagging, which doesn't fit on my screen without scrolling. star rating + color + tags) which XnView simply cannot do.Ī. Note I've never really used Lightroom (but I have seen demos of it's capabilities) so this is mostly about my DAM needs and comparing my experience with XnView MP and a few simpler image viewers.ĭigiKam is mostly what I expect in a DAM with great search capabilities, including multiple filters at once (e.g.
#Xnviewmp review windows
I was using XnView MP as a DAM, but its search capabilities are very rudimentary.Īfter a bit of a search for a new DAM (see ), I've chosen DigiKam, and have been using version 4.12 on Windows (it also runs on OSX and Linux (KDE)) for a few weeks.
0 kommentar(er)
